|
As expected following the Chancellor's comments over the
weekend, the Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) focus was very much on
expensive residential properties and most of the SDLT measures
are concerned with residential properties over £2 million. From
22 March 2012, individuals will pay SDLT at the rate of 7% on
buying such property.
And, effective from the day of the Budget, companies making such
a purchase will pay at 15%. This much higher rate for companies
(and certain other non-natural persons) is rooted in the
perception that companies are used as a vehicle to avoid SDLT by
allowing subsequent changes of ownership to be effected through
share sales. The action against this 'enveloping' is punitive,
as the Chancellor had warned it would be. It also does not
apparently distinguish between special purposes companies and
those companies (or funds) which hold multiple assets, or indeed
are widely held.
|
|

Toby Price
Tax director
|
|
And this is only round one. On the same basis, the Government
also announced consultation on an annual levy where such
properties are held by companies. The levy would be based on the
value of the property, starting at £15,000 but increasing on a
scale to £140,000 where the value is greater than £20m. More
detail is no doubt to come, including whether the 15% entry
charge and annual levy, which will commence in April 2013, will
be cumulative.
Another SDLT measure is to amend Subsale relief to make it clear
that it does not apply to the grant of options. This measure,
which applies to residential and commercial property, is
immediate and is to block a specific scheme which, for the
record, most thought did not work anyway.
In addition, the Chancellor announced that SDLT will be included
within the scope of the General Anti Avoidance Rule
(GAAR),intended to be introduced next year, and that there will
be consultation on simplifying certain aspects of the SDLT lease
duty rules.
Although more detail is needed on the annual levy, these
measures are perhaps more straightforward than the land rich
property rules which many other jurisdictions have and which had
been proposed by the Government in the UK twice before (in 2002
and 2007). The measures are tough on high-end residential
property and, in a parting shot, the Chancellor's speech
included a warning that he would not hesitate to take further
action in this area swiftly, without notice and retrospectively.
|